On 15/01/13 15:10, plutek wrote: >> You might be interested in using drFlux instead, running that in a >> screen session and sending your text there. That works, though >> it's less pleasant when you missed a closing bracket. >> >> Hope that helps you in the right direction. > > thanks, kas! > > interesting ideas, and i may take a look at drFlux. still, i guess my > basic question is why fluxus (this nice, light, and nimble tool) > needs the whole big machinery of racket before we can even compile > it...
You might be interested in 'nomadic' the version of fluxus I'm working on for ARM based platforms (Raspberry Pi and Android) also builds on linux (and PS2) - it uses a modified version tinyscheme, part of the source, and the only dependency is OpenGL ES. https://github.com/nebogeo/nomadic-engine It's pretty basic though atm, lacking a livecode editor (working on that) and simpler scheme interpreters like tinyscheme are _much_ slower than racket. The aim is to produce something that is around 95% scheme code compatible with the main version. We'll see... cheers, dave
