Eric Schrock wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:35:42PM -0800, Richard Elling wrote: > >> The reason I have heartburn is the statement about "only one chassis." >> Since each blade can claim there is "only one chassis" it causes confusion. >> It took us years to train people for this with the starcat, but that is >> a small segment of the population, even today. Similarly, virtualized >> machines can be considered as sharing a chassis, of sorts. If we >> clarify this by saying something like "only pertains to the one >> chassis containing parts that this domain can see" we may be speaking >> the truth, but it leaves the customer feeling empty. >> >> > > This is more a statement of the current state of the project, rather > than the ultimate goal. As Russ pointed out, this is orthogonal to the > use of the term "chassis" in the topology. We plan to move beyond > single system chassis once this phase is complete, assuming we can find > such systems that support IPMI. >
Forward movement is cool. -- richard _______________________________________________ fm-discuss mailing list fm-discuss@opensolaris.org
