Doh!

Yes, I had the requestor and supplier reversed.  I now get all of my 
company_contact records created.

Thanks Jason.

--- In [email protected], "Jason Birch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think I'm missing something.  
>  
> If the company_id is stored in a single column in the contacts 
table, I don't think that you should have duplicate suppliers; you 
will only match one company per row. Are you using the contacts table 
as the requestor and the companies table as the supplier?
>  
> If there are duplicates (I could use some clarification on why) you 
could try specifying a list, and then using a ListExploder to get 
individual records.
>  
> One thing to be careful of is which attributes you're dealing 
with.  I often use the AttributeKeeper and AttributePrefixer 
transformers prior to using a FeatureMerger so that there is no room 
for confusion.
>  
> Jason
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: [email protected] on behalf of wallace_tobin
> Subject: [fme] Re: Builiding intermediate tables while converting 
parent tables in many-to-many
> 
> 
> 
> As for the company contacts intermediate table I did use the feature
> merger in exactly the way you have mentioned here and I am not able
> top get the duplicate contactid_companyid records from the feature
> merger even though I have turned on the option to process the
> duplicates.  The duplicates are created but they do not contain the
> information from the company table record as I believe it should.  I
> can't seem to find a way to get it to give back the duplicates with
> the valid companyid?  I haven't used the feature merger before so
> maybe I need a little direction on getting this to work properly?
>










Join us at the FME Worldwide User Conference Sept. 21-22, 2006 Vancouver BC 
Canada. For more information, visit www.safe.com/2006uc.   
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fme/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to