Thanks JD,
You can attach it to any email you send to the group or, if you use
the web interface, there is a Files section you can add it to.

Since you sent it to me I've put it in the files section, but also
posted it to a page on fmepedia, with the description you gave...
http://www.fmepedia.com/index.php/Sandbox

Mark

--- In [email protected], "jamison_leach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Good afternoon,
> 
>      I've come up with a graphic with annotation to illustrate this
> better, but how can I attach it to post in this forum?
> 
> Regards,
> JD
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "mark2atsafe" <mark.ireland@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi J.D.,
> > I'm having trouble visualising this one. Can you run up a quick
> > sketched image to illustrate what you mean?
> > 
> > I'm thinking that you must also be using the 2DPointAdder to add the
> > point onto the modified line when you've attached the coord values -
> > else those values wouldn't do anything.
> > 
> > At that point I'd think it depends on the direction of each line
> > relative to each other. ie if they run in the same direction then the
> > start point of the modified line would be the same as the start of the
> > unmodified line (because you've copied it from one to the other)
> > giving a distance value of 0 - and the same with the end point.
> > 
> > If they run in opposite directions then the start/end points would be
> > different, so it wouldn't be 0, but you'd still get the same value for
> > each (because each measurement is the same, just in different
> directions).
> > 
> > But like I said, I can't quite visualize this, and might have it
wrong!
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Mark
> > 
> > Mark Ireland, Senior Product Specialist
> > Safe Software Inc. Surrey, BC, CANADA
> > support@ http://www.safe.com
> > Solutions for Spatial Data Translation, Distribution and Access
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "jamison_leach" <hemsidan@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Good morning,
> > > 
> > >      I have a Workbench file that currently does the following:
> > > 
> > >      1. uses CoordinateFetcher to retrieve the start and end
points of
> > >     lines.
> > >      2. merges the start/end point coordinates from these lines onto
> > > spatially modified versions of the same lines (using FeatureMerger
> > > with Merge Type 'Attributes Only' and Join Attributes set for a
common
> > > field).
> > >      3. calculates the distance from the start point of each
modified
> > > line to both the start and end points of the unmodified line
> > > (Literally, I suppose, LengthToPointCalculator doesn't use the
> > > original line's start and end point coordinates for the distance
> > > calculation, but uses the points on the modified line closest to the
> > > original line's start and end points).
> > > 
> > > So ultimately, this Workbench file should provide me with two
> > > distances, both calculated from the start point of the modified
line:
> > >      1. To the point on the modified line closest to the original
> > > line's start point
> > >      1. To the point on the modified line closest to the original
> > > line's end point.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I have run this process on certain files and it seems to work fine.
> > > However, with the latest set of files I ran, most of the
distances do
> > > not appear to be correct. The coordinates of the original line's
start
> > > and end points look good coming out of CoordinateFetcher, but when
> > > LengthToPointCalculator estimates their distance from the modified
> > > line's start point, the two distances come up equal, either as
'0' or
> > > a non-zero, but still equal value. If I'm thinking correctly, the
> > > original line would usually have to start and end at the same point
> > > for both distances to be the same, but the start and end points are
> > > very different.
> > > 
> > > In other cases, the two distances appear to be correct, or at least
> > > not the same as each other.
> > > 
> > > Does anyone have any insight on this? Am I overlooking something?
> > > 
> > > Many thanks,
> > > J.D. Leach
> > > U.S. Census Bureau
> > >
> >
>




For insights into what's up at Safe Software and what's on the development 
horizon, visit Safe's blog at spatial-etl.blogspot.com.

Love FME? Then open your diary to March 6-7, 2008 and write this... "Second 
Worldwide FME User Conference - Must Attend!" See 
http://www.safe.com/company/fmeuc2008/index.php for more details. 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fme/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fme/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to