I performed the same tests and larger on the Toplayer 5500-1000 with virtually
zero latentcy. Throughput is very important, so is the size of your pipe and
the ability to finely tune policy. This is why I think the Toplayer is a good
choice for most implmentations.
IMHO the Riverhead and Arbor are also good products for ISPs looking to do a
large backbone deployment as they can dynamically change routing in the network
based on anomily detection (this also means extra equipment is required).
Whilst the Toplayer is good for proxy based and point solutions, bare in mind
that a point solution can be a multi gig pipe.
-----Original Message-----
From: Joel Friedman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 23/11/2005 20:07
To: [email protected]
Cc:
Subject: RE: Denial of Service: Commercial Defense products
