You are right that these kinds of DoS attacks are difficult to detect
at Network IDS/IPS level due to the problems you mentioned - false
positives and false negatives.

I suggest that you consider "version" of cisco routers in your rules
to avoid false positives in deployment scnearios where CISCO routers
are not used.

Thanks
Srini

On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Ravi Chunduru
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please see these links for more information on vulnerability:
>
> http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2008-1151
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080969862.shtml
>
> According to this vulnerability report,  PPTP process in CISCO routers
> leak memory upon every PPTP termination. Eventually memory is used up
> and no other PPTP connections are entertained.
>
> How does one go about writing signatures for detecting exploits
> targeting this vulnerability?
> Only possibility I can think of, based on capabilities of signature
> language, is to check for the rate at which these PPTP connections are
> made. If it checks for higher rate, there could be false negatives
> where attacker makes the connections at very slow rate.  If it checks
> for lower rate,  then there is possibility of false positives. What is
> the right way of writing signatures?
>
>
> thanks
> Ravi
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Test Your IDS
>
> Is your IDS deployed correctly?
> Find out quickly and easily by testing it
> with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
> Go to 
> http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaign=intro_sfw
> to learn more.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it 
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to 
http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaign=intro_sfw
 
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to