I guess I’m not clear on what the inputs and outputs of the RNN would be.  
Would I send in various JSON documents with a YES/NO flag?  Or would I send in 
each JSON document with incrementally updated schema?  Obviously I would get 
the schema as output.  How would I determine an error for back propagation?  
Sorry, my knowledge of RNNs is limited.  I am trying to get a library, but so 
far I see netCDF and I have to convert my JSON documents to netCDF and download 
a bunch of packages. Also, my JSON documents are nested and hierarchical in 
nature.

John
> On Nov 4, 2015, at 10:27 PM, Matthew Retchin <mretc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> If you have a ton of examples to train on, that makes a recurrent neural 
> network even more attractive as (part of) a solution, doesn't it?
> 
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:22 PM, John Carlson <yottz...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:yottz...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Sorry, I said that wrong.  I am trying to generate a single JSON schema from 
> thousands of JSON files. I don’t  want a different JSON schema per JSON 
> document.  I think that might make a difference as to what technology to use.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John
> 
>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 9:36 PM, David Barbour <dmbarb...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:dmbarb...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> You could probably repurpose a recurrent neural network to compute a likely 
>> schema in polynomial time.
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015, 8:03 PM John Carlson <yottz...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:yottz...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> I am familiar with Grammex, but I want wondering if there’s been any more 
>> effort to create syntax by incremental example, given that validation tools 
>> are present (online, either getting feedback from a compiler, or ideally 
>> from an IDE with incremental compiling and code completion).  I think from 
>> reading about reverse engineering protocols that this might be polynomial 
>> time, whereas, without a validator (offline), it’s NP-complete?  Or is that 
>> only for regular grammars?  What about “syntax-free” languages, like machine 
>> code? Is this where the idea that it’s NP-complete came from? I’m actually 
>> interested in creating JSON schemas from thousands of example JSON files.  I 
>> want something more detailed than the JSON specification, with domain 
>> validation.
>> John
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fonc mailing list
>> Fonc@mailman.vpri.org <mailto:Fonc@mailman.vpri.org>
>> http://mailman.vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc_mailman.vpri.org 
>> <http://mailman.vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc_mailman.vpri.org>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Fonc mailing list
> Fonc@mailman.vpri.org <mailto:Fonc@mailman.vpri.org>
> http://mailman.vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc_mailman.vpri.org 
> <http://mailman.vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc_mailman.vpri.org>
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Fonc mailing list
Fonc@mailman.vpri.org
http://mailman.vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc_mailman.vpri.org

Reply via email to