Hi,
I think Alex is cooking you a verbose reply. If you can see how the
following work, you understand (set...) and (define...) completely
and precisely why your example does what it does.
Cheers,
Ian
(syntax set-foo
(lambda (node comp)
[StdOut nextPutAll: '"SETTER "]
[StdOut println: node]
'42))
(syntax define-foo
(lambda (node comp)
[StdOut nextPutAll: '"DEFINER "]
[StdOut println: node]
'42))
(syntax define-send
(lambda (node comp)
[StdOut nextPutAll: '"SENDER "]
[StdOut println: node]
'42))
(set (foo bar baz) qux)
(define (foo bar baz) qux peppermint poodles)
(define [foo bar: baz] qux poodles)
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
