Hi there VPRI!

I think more transparency is needed from VPRI for the general public.
Maybe I was not careful to read something you wrote in a PDF somewhere
(I printed out many and read them on bus trips), so feel free to point
me out to your documents and let me look things up myself if that
answers a question I have here.

The lacking (concrete) information about you is kind of frustrating to
browse and explore over the Internet for someone as curious about your
project as me.  I wonder how work is proceeding at VPRI.  The last news
I can find is the 2007 report, and some messages on the FONC mailing
list and work on idst.  I have no clue at all what is going on, or
whether most of the VPRI staff caught the flu and was sick all those
past few months.  After reading several of your papers that I could find
online and starting to fiddle with idst, I'd just like to have a very
general birds-eye view of things, like:

- Are you still in the starting phase of the project?  This would maybe
explain why I don't find much (well-structured, concise, guiding)
information about it and why you (don't) struggle to keep your website
up-to-date with recent developments.  (And I rather see you research
fundamentally new computer systems than fiddle around with boring old HTML.)

- Are you working on a (very) diverse set of projects and/or more
towards a whole, coherent system?  What are those projects?

- Are there already (many) people working on VPRI projects that are from
outside the core group funded by the NSF grant?  How is that group
working together, and could it make its internal communications a bit
more public?  (Or are they and I just didn't encounter them yet?  Or do
you all communicate mostly on the phone, or even meet in person?  Or do
you work isolated from each other most of the time and teams of one
don't need communication and hence no publicity anyway?)

- How did it all start?  (Where are your roots, how did the key people
find together to do this project?  What is the role of the "advisors"?)
 Where are you heading?  What are the most interesting pieces you can
show off and let (the computer-literate) people download and try out?
(The things I looked at so far are the Lively Kernel and idst.  It was
quite cumbersome to find them and see that they are worked on under the
VPRI umbrella.)  What are the "core papers" to read?  (Like, I've read
the First Year Progress Report 2007 and didn't know what would be the
best things to read next.  Mind you, I'm studying Theology and not
Computer Science (programming since the age of 8 though), and thus
limited time makes me gladly reach for any shortcut through your tons of
interesting papers that leads me to the things I'd like to get involved
with.)

- Is there a way you could keep the Internet community more up-to-date
about your work at VPRI?

Maybe NSF is fine with a yearly report (and sure requires you to do
those), but if you wish to get the open source community involved, there
needs to be a constant flow of tiny pieces of interesting information to
feed interested parties.  Typically, project websites include a news
(front) page, a download section, and clear links to communication
facilities (mailing list, wiki, IRC) - which are somewhat lacking or
hard to find on the vpri.org pages.

Some more concrete questions:

- Are the "IS system" and the "COLA architecture" talked about in your
2007 yearly report identical to Ian Piumartas idst software system?  Is
idst the new name for COLA or is it a superset, containing COLA?

- Is idst supposed to be the bootstrapping platform for all the VPRI
things to come?  I.e. is it "safe" for me to invest time into learning
it and programming with it, or will it be thrown away again in the near
future? -- Ok, the FONC mailing list does not have to have the traffic
of the GCC mailing list, but it does worry me that the FONC mailing list
has so little of it.  I cannot imagine that this project is not
inherently of deep interest to virtually most of the open source
community!  If there was no NSF grant, I'd call this a virtually dead
project and would not touch it from a distance even, other than maybe
having a look at it once a year.  I want to see the VPRI work thriving
beyond the NSF grant, and this needs more visible participation than it
has now, at least from a open source volunteer point of view.

- How is OMeta, described at http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~awarth/ometa/,
related to idst?  (Just saw "Platform: COLA: Coming soon", so will OMeta
be based on idst?  Will it be an essential part of idst, or even an
evolutionary next step?)

What's left to say?

Keep up your important work!  I'm basically fed up with (the clunkyness
of) computers and I am by far not alone with that feeling (and I know I
don't have to tell you, it's so obviously frustrating to use common
computers).  And thus I am glad for every minute of progress you make.
So I almost feel kind of bad to let you waste your time reading all
this, but maybe you could get more people involved in the project and
thus accomplish more within your five year funding timeframe.  At least
I'd like to contribute towards getting the really great, but forgotten
ideas of computer science implemented.  I want to know more closely
what's going on (right now) in VPRI so that I can contribute most
efficiently, even if I have to limit my contributions heavily due to
other priorities.

Best wishes,
Felix Rabe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to