I've been reading Roy and Haridi's "Concepts, Techniques, and Models of Computer Programming" [1], and I see it as a great practical approach to VPRI's ideas on the principles of programming languages. Is there anyone more autoritative here who could chime in on the intellectual connection (if there is one)?
Cheers, Andrey 1. http://www.amazon.com/dp/0262220695 On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Gerry J <geral...@tpg.com.au> wrote: > John, et al > I am interested in what you think are the better approach alternatives to > handle complexity and size (etc), what criteria should apply and why one > ranks higher than another. > For example, should a language support both actors and be model driven? > Is a mix of type inference and explicit typing with operators (like OCAML) > better than extremely late binding, and for what? > Should there be a hierarchy of syntax compatible languages, with different > restrictions, say extremely late binding at the top, and fully typed and OS > or device driver oriented at the bottom? > (ie pick the right tool in the family, size of hand held screwdriver up to > exchangeable bits for a power tool). > Thanks for your interesting references and insights. > > Regards, > Gerry Jensen > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > fonc@vpri.org > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc >
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
