On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 03:00:35PM -0800, Casey Ransberger wrote:

> Books? First, the smell. Especially old books. I have a friend who has a 
> Kindle. It smells *nothing* like a library, and I do think something is lost 
> there. 

Some people get olfactorically imprinted on dead tree
during their formative years. I personally like the smell
having basically grown up in libraries, but it's not
integral to the experience (and easily simulable, in
principle, for someone who would care to bring a cryotrap
into a library, and GC-MS the results thereof to be
able to synthesize the most relevant fragrances --
you could even encapsulate the result in the
polymer skin of an ebook reader to be given off
during use).
 
> It's also, ironically, the weight of them. The sense of holding something 
> *real* that in turn holds information. When you move, it takes work to keep a 
> book, so one tends to keep the most "important" books one has, whereas with 
> digital we just keep whatever we have "rights" to read, because there's no 
> real expense in keeping. We also can't really share, at least not yet. Not in 
> any legal model. 

You can have heat maps of things you access, or
order items on virtual bookshelves. As to legality of
sharing: nobody cares. It's not enforcible, anyway.
 
> Second: when I finish a book, I usually give it away to someone else who'd 
> enjoy it. Unless I've missed a headline, I can't do this with ebooks any more 
> readily than that dubstep-blackmetal-rap album we still need to record when I 
> buy it on iTunes (or whatever.)

Funny, I send ebooks as email attachments just fine.
 
> ;)
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to