On 09/12/2012, at 10:29 AM, David Barbour <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Julian Leviston <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm a bit confused - general architecture of what, exactly? Sorry if this is > obvious. The organisation? The artefact that VPRI will eventually produce? or > FoNC itself? > > Based on the sample views, I assume an architecture for an integrated > development environment. > > > Surely REASON comes before PROCESS, doesn't it? > > Process does not happen before or after reason. Reasoning is part of the > process. People often think with their fingers and bodies - tweaking, > twiddling, learning, inspiring, a sort of brownian motion in thought space. > The process (paradigm, language, architecture) makes certain kinds of > reasoning more or less difficult, and thus less or more probable. > LOL. "a" reason, not "reason". Note I didn't say "reasoning comes before processing". I meant "a reason to do something" surely must come before and inform "a process to do". As in... the point of doing what you're doing. I thought this might be obvious from my example (I guess not?) Julian > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nudge_(book) > > Regards, > > Dave > > > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > [email protected] > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
