Op 25 mrt. 2013, om 17:35 heeft John Tromp <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven:
>> PGA is very different from BLC of course, but both are a simple linear >> notations. PGA starts with jump instructions, and it has step by step >> extensions for variables, control structures, semaphores etc. It has been >> used as a projection of Ruby's OO constructs. >> So I hope PGA could give you some ideas. > > PGA looks like a notation for control flow as a basis for an imperative > language. BLC is a self-contained pure functional language aimed at > minimal programs. This seems a case of comparing apples and oranges:-) Apples and oranges look far more similar than PGA and BLC. I would say it is more a case of apples and apple trees. Very different in appearance, but deep inside they share DNA, and the one form gives birth to the other form. _______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
