For me, classification, taxonomy, categorization, schema and ontology are
contentious ideas.

Fwiw,

Johb
On Apr 3, 2013 2:56 PM, "Gath-Gealaich" <[email protected]> wrote:

> "Our language, much like everything these days, has been *hacked*. *Fuzzy,
> contentious, and complex ideas* have been stripped of their subversive
> connotations and replaced by cleaner, shinier, and emptier alternatives"
>
> Emphasis mine. Am I the only one feeling that these two sentences are
> deliciously ironic when put next to each other?
>
> - Gath
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Ryan Mitchley <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> http://thebaffler.com/past/**the_meme_hustler<http://thebaffler.com/past/the_meme_hustler>
>>
>> I have to admit that I had not previously encountered such focused
>> criticism of O'Reilly.
>>
>> With passing mentions of Engelbart and Postman, the essay may be of some
>> interest to the list.
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> fonc mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://vpri.org/mailman/**listinfo/fonc<http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fonc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>
>
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to