only in practice

On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 8:23 PM, John Carlson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Take my word for it, theory comes down to Monday Night Football on ESPN.
> On Apr 20, 2013 10:13 PM, "John Carlson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I think that concepts in some sense transcend the universe.  Are there
>> more digits in pi than there are atoms  in the universe?  I guess we are
>> asking if there are transcendental volumes which are bigger or more complex
>> than the universe.  If the universe contains the transcendental as symbols
>> then how many transcendental symbols are there?  I think you still run into
>> Russell's Paradox.
>> On Apr 20, 2013 9:15 PM, "Simon Forman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/20/13, John Carlson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > Do you need one symbol for the number infinity and another for denoting
>>> > that a set is inifinite?  Or do you just reason about the size of the
>>> set?
>>> > Is there a difference between a set that is countably infinite and one
>>> that
>>> > isn't countable?  I barely know Russell's paradox... you're ahead of
>>> me.
>>>
>>> Well, for what it's worth, quoting from Meguire's 2007 "Boundary
>>> Algebra: A Simple Notation for Boolean Algebra and the Truth
>>> Functors":
>>>
>>> "Let U be the universal set, a,b∈U, and ∅ be the null set. Then the
>>> columns headed by “Sets” show how the algebra of sets and the pa are
>>> equivalent.
>>>
>>> Table 4-2. The 10 Nontrivial Binary Connectives (Functors).
>>>
>>> Name            Logic  Sets BA
>>>
>>> Alternation      a∨b   a∪b  ab
>>> Conditional      a→b   a⊆b  (a)b
>>> Converse         a←b   a⊇b  a(b)
>>> Conjunction      a∧b   a∩b  ((a)(b))
>>>                        ___
>>> NOR              a↓b   a∪b   (ab)
>>>                        ___
>>> Sheffer stroke   a|b   a∩b  (a)(b)
>>>
>>> Biconditional    a↔b   a⊆b⊆a  (((a)b)(a(b))) -or- ((a)(b))(ab)
>>>
>>> (Apologies if the Unicode characters got mangled!)
>>>
>>> Check out http://www.markability.net/sets.htm also.
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't know much about set theory but I think the "Universal" set
>>> stands for the set of everything, no?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> ~Simon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "The history of mankind for the last four centuries is rather like that
>>> of
>>> an imprisoned sleeper, stirring clumsily and uneasily while the prison
>>> that
>>> restrains and shelters him catches fire, not waking but incorporating the
>>> crackling and warmth of the fire with ancient and incongruous dreams,
>>> than
>>> like that of a man consciously awake to danger and opportunity."
>>> --H. P. Wells, "A Short History of the World"
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> fonc mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> fonc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>
>
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to