If there truly is a universal language, is it a systems language?  A logic
language can describe hardware.  What about things like pointers?  Have
they come up with self-referential logic?
On Apr 20, 2013 11:18 PM, "John Carlson" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think it's better to work from examples, ala JUnit and end-user
> programming than come up with a theory that solves nothing.  One can
> compare EGGG to GDL in scope and expressiveness.  One interesting part of
> gaming is arguing about rules.  What computer systems do that?
> On Apr 20, 2013 11:09 PM, "John Carlson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Practice or practical?  Maybe there's space for practical theory, instead
>> of relying on things that don't exist.  Why do we distinguish practice from
>> theory?  Seems like a fallacy there.
>> On Apr 20, 2013 10:51 PM, "David Barbour" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> only in practice
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 8:23 PM, John Carlson <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Take my word for it, theory comes down to Monday Night Football on ESPN.
>>>> On Apr 20, 2013 10:13 PM, "John Carlson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think that concepts in some sense transcend the universe.  Are there
>>>>> more digits in pi than there are atoms  in the universe?  I guess we are
>>>>> asking if there are transcendental volumes which are bigger or more 
>>>>> complex
>>>>> than the universe.  If the universe contains the transcendental as symbols
>>>>> then how many transcendental symbols are there?  I think you still run 
>>>>> into
>>>>> Russell's Paradox.
>>>>> On Apr 20, 2013 9:15 PM, "Simon Forman" <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/20/13, John Carlson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> > Do you need one symbol for the number infinity and another for
>>>>>> denoting
>>>>>> > that a set is inifinite?  Or do you just reason about the size of
>>>>>> the set?
>>>>>> > Is there a difference between a set that is countably infinite and
>>>>>> one that
>>>>>> > isn't countable?  I barely know Russell's paradox... you're ahead
>>>>>> of me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, for what it's worth, quoting from Meguire's 2007 "Boundary
>>>>>> Algebra: A Simple Notation for Boolean Algebra and the Truth
>>>>>> Functors":
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Let U be the universal set, a,b∈U, and ∅ be the null set. Then the
>>>>>> columns headed by “Sets” show how the algebra of sets and the pa are
>>>>>> equivalent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Table 4-2. The 10 Nontrivial Binary Connectives (Functors).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Name            Logic  Sets BA
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alternation      a∨b   a∪b  ab
>>>>>> Conditional      a→b   a⊆b  (a)b
>>>>>> Converse         a←b   a⊇b  a(b)
>>>>>> Conjunction      a∧b   a∩b  ((a)(b))
>>>>>>                        ___
>>>>>> NOR              a↓b   a∪b   (ab)
>>>>>>                        ___
>>>>>> Sheffer stroke   a|b   a∩b  (a)(b)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Biconditional    a↔b   a⊆b⊆a  (((a)b)(a(b))) -or- ((a)(b))(ab)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (Apologies if the Unicode characters got mangled!)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Check out http://www.markability.net/sets.htm also.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know much about set theory but I think the "Universal" set
>>>>>> stands for the set of everything, no?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> ~Simon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "The history of mankind for the last four centuries is rather like
>>>>>> that of
>>>>>> an imprisoned sleeper, stirring clumsily and uneasily while the
>>>>>> prison that
>>>>>> restrains and shelters him catches fire, not waking but incorporating
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> crackling and warmth of the fire with ancient and incongruous dreams,
>>>>>> than
>>>>>> like that of a man consciously awake to danger and opportunity."
>>>>>> --H. P. Wells, "A Short History of the World"
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> fonc mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> fonc mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> fonc mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>>>
>>>
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to