Check out http://www.cat-language.com/
BR John Skickat från min iPhone 4 sep 2013 kl. 01:43 skrev Casey Ransberger <[email protected]>: > I've heavily abridged your message David; sorry if I've dropped important > context. My words below... > > On Sep 3, 2013, at 3:04 PM, David Barbour <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Even better if the languages are good for exploration by genetic programming >> - i.e. easily sliced, spliced, rearranged, mutated. > > I've only seen this done with two languages. Certainly it's possible in any > language with the right "semantic chops" but so far it seems like we're > looking at Lisp (et al) and FORTH. > > My observation has been that the main quality that yields (ease of > recombination? I don't even know what it is for sure) is "syntaxlessness." > > I'd love to know about other languages and qualities of languages that are > conducive to this sort of thing, especially if anyone has seen interesting > work done with one of the logic languages. > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > [email protected] > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
