Am 04.10.2013 13:04, schrieb Loup Vaillant-David: > As for augmenting the human intellect, I hope we will see improvements > over the current peer-review-then-publish model of doing science. (An > obvious idea would be continuous crowd review, which would mark papers > as they become obsolete, invalidated, confirmed, superseded…). > I have mused for some weeks over a website where users could present theories (not just arguments) about just anything in a way that makes it possible to follow the reasoning in a rigorous way - basically adding logic statements to write definitions, define sets and subsets, apply logic rules etc.
Imagine if a debate about any controversial topic could be enhanced with such a reasonable presentation of theories and conclusions instead of the endless "Yes" - "No" - "It is!" - "It isn't!" I haven't got the detailed concept for that site yet, don't know whether it will ever exist... Cheers, Hans-Martin _______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
