>From what I've read, git uses a DAG. I'm not quite sure what makes it better than XML except people love to hate XML. I think people who embrace c, c++, java have tended to jump on the xml bandwagon because those languages suck at doing things like xml, unless you enjoy using arrays of object arrays. I've actually written SAX parsers to go from XML to Java and back again. Exercise left to reader. On Mar 7, 2014 7:05 PM, "Loup Vaillant-David" <l...@loup-vaillant.fr> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 11:31:08PM +0600, Attila Lendvai wrote: > > https://plus.google.com/+LinusTorvalds/posts/X2XVf9Q7MfV > > > > nothing interesting if you ask me. a few dozen more shell scripts to > > glue it together and git will work just fine for just about > > anything... :) > > Which by itself sounds most interesting. Why Git is so widely > applicable in the first place? Surely there's power to be drawn from > that knowledge. > > Loup. > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > fonc@vpri.org > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc >
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
