Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #67 from caribou <[email protected]> 2010-10-19 00:39:05 PDT --- I noticed that the font-stretch property parsing is now implemented and that each DOM element has the correct runtime value though the stretching itself is not implemented. I also noticed that the @font-face declaration parsing mechanism knows about font-stretch. I was wondering if it was difficult to implement the font switching when using user fonts defined with @font-face regarding the value of font-stretch as it does with the font-style and font-weight ones. Ex: @font-face { font-family : MyFont; src : url(myfont.otf); font-stretch : normal; } @font-face { font-family : MyFont; src : url(myfont-condensed.otf); font-stretch : condensed; } ... @font-face { font-family : MyFont; src : url(myfont-expanded.otf); font-stretch : expanded; } Actually, the latest @font-face declaration overrides the previous one and there is no font switching at all. In case that not all of the stretch variants are defined through @font-face, the closest stretch font could be applied. I don't think this represents a lot of work as all the basis are already implemented (font-stretch and @font-face parsing) Anyone can tell me if this partial implementation represents a lot of work to include it in the future release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts-bugs http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
