Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664699 Ralf Corsepius <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rc040...@freenet. | |de) | --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius <[email protected]> 2010-12-21 10:44:56 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) > What do you think about the patch in attachment 469993 [details] ? OK, that's the classic subshell pushd/popd approach - I don't any reason why it shouldn't work. It's advantage is it being usable should once a loop be introduced around the pushd/popd, it's downside it the subshell having its price. An alternative would be the "save pwd" approach. sav_pwd=`pwd` cd <somewhere> do-something cd ${sav_pwd} This would avoid the subshell and therefore is somewhat less expensive, but it would not be suitable for "loops". AFAIS, ATM the latter alternative would suffice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts-bugs http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
