Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706559 --- Comment #10 from David Woodhouse <[email protected]> 2011-05-23 09:40:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Generally speaking, changing the fonts so their metadata is > fontconfig-friendly > is usually the best choice. I ought to be able to do that by taking apart the existing TTF files and rebuilding them, right? All I need to do is work out what you mean by 'fontconfig-friendly'... :) In what way is the current metadata, as shown in the attachment in comment 5, not "fontconfig-friendly"? Is this a bug in the font, which I should be asking them to fix "upstream", or just something we don't really cope with very well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts-bugs http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
