Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856239
--- Comment #118 from Mike FABIAN <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 656619 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=656619&action=edit liberation-sans-2-autohint=true-different-hintstyles-rgba=rgb.png And one more screenshot using Liberatin 2.00 using the autohinter. rgba=rgb hinting=true autohint=true <- i.e. *not* using the byte code always and then the results for hintstyle={hintfull,hintmedium,hintslight,hintnone} are compared. hintmedium and hintslight give identical results. hintnone is slightly fuzzier. hintfull is slightly sharper. But the differences are small, *all* of them are quite fuzzy. => using the autohinter, liberation sans 2.00 also never renders as sharp as liberation 1.07 with the bytecode interpreter and hintfull. No matter what settings are used for liberation sans 2.00, it will always render much fuzzier then liberation 1.07. comment#109, Kevin Kofler> And I wonder whether the hinting in comment#109, Kevin Kofler> CrosCore / Liberation 2 is the result of comment#109, Kevin Kofler> running ttfautohint or some other comment#109, Kevin Kofler> low-quality automated process. I also think this has likely been done by some automated process, I think byte code for very sharp rendering as in liberation 1.07 cannot be done automatically, it is a tedious manual process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts-bugs http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
