https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021757
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Tim Waugh from comment #1) > For the postuninstall scriptlet too? > > Is there anything planned for the Fedora Project packaging guidelines to > make sure there are no regressions with this? Well, what the packaging guidelines actually say is that you shouldn't install any font without using fontpackages-devel templates and macros or splitting fonts per family, which means all font packages have the same implementation and there is no risk of single-package regression. I appreciate that ghostscript antedates the consolidation work that went into current font packaging guidelines, but maybe it's time to align it with them? Also TEX people have spent many years cleaning up and modernizing gs fonts. It would be worthwhile to package the tex gyre family and use them as replacement, dropping all legacy font formats and core font calls. I *think* tex gyre licensing is finally clean and safe (but you'd need to check with spot) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YytwqnI59n&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts-bugs http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
