https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026871

Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|---                         |NOTABUG
        Last Closed|                            |2014-02-11 14:16:45



--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Michael Kovarik from comment #3)

> The aliases map STIX 1.1.0 font names to 1.0 names. Apparently, these are
> not at all compatible, with 1.1.0 not fully readable by browsers.


I read this as "browsers do not want to update their code to work with Stix >
1.0"

Well, this is a browser bug. Upstream stix changed to take into account issues
reported after their .0 release, it fixed actual correctness bugs and problems
indentified in big apps such as office suites, it took it months of work and
there's not way upstream is going back now 

I realise 1.1 is a it harder to process since 1.0 was a pile of raw elements
that lend them well to all sorts of hardcoded macros. Those hacks are history
and it's high time browsers adapted.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XPPi4CwlF9&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
fonts-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts-bugs
http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/

Reply via email to