https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545149
--- Comment #11 from Pierre Ossman <[email protected]> --- instead. (In reply to Nikolaus Waxweiler from comment #8) > Do you mean subpixel rendering? > Right, sorry. ftview does its own thing, so I started simply comparing GTK applications. The setting I was referring to here is "Antialiasing: Subpixel" in GNOME Tweaks. > This is interesting. In ftview from that build, If I enable normal > anti-aliasing (A) and forced autohinting (f) and switch to subpixel > rendering (C) and forced autohinting, some glyphs seems to glitch by being a > pixel or so wider at 16px (e.g. i, j, doubles quotes). Aside from that, > nothing changes significantly? > ftview's rendering doesn't seem to be representative of what GTK does, so it might not be the best test case. Your image does show a bit of the tendencies though as there are a lot of single pixel wide stems in the lower left example. (and the glitch is mentioned on bug 1035486 comment #36) > In the newest ftview from git, I can't seem to enable full autohinting with > subpixel rendering. Isn't that the problem though? Neither ftview nor GTK is able to get that mode fully working. (In reply to Nikolaus Waxweiler from comment #10) > Going on a limb here, have you tried enabling warping? Only available in > slight autohinting mode. It seems to have some effect, but it doesn't even compensate for the extra blur caused by going from full hinting to slight. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
