https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747737
--- Comment #4 from Marek Blaha <[email protected]> --- May I ask you what version of dnf are you using? My first thought was, that the provide/obsolete are missing in newer version by a mistake. But in liberation-fonts changelog I found: * Mon Jun 24 2019 Vishal Vijayraghavan <vvijayra AT redhat DOT com> - 1:2.00.5-3 - Resolves: rhbz#1643920: Removed Obsoletes: %{fontname}-narrow-fonts and Provides: %{fontname}-narrow-fonts macro - Splitted the font family(mono, sans and serif) into diferrent root font directories Now the situation is confusing for the dependency solver: - given the obsolete/provide in the version liberation-fonts-1:2.00.5-1.fc30.noarch, this is the best version of liberation-narrow-fonts package - at the same time liberation-fonts-1:2.00.5-3.fc30.noarch is the best version of liberation-fonts this end in solution where two versions of liberation-fonts are about to be installed, which is not viable. I'm not sure how to solve this situation, but better workaround at the moment is not to use versionlock (as I recommended in comment#1), but exclude liberation-fonts-1:2.00.5-1.fc30.noarch package. E.g. adding excludepkgs=liberation-fonts-1:2.00.5-1.fc30.noarch line into [main] section of /etc/dnf/dnf.conf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
