https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
--- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH <[email protected]> --- No, no orth for Coptic. I locally added cop.orth for testing purpose like the following coverage according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coptic_script: 03E2-03EF # Greek and Coptic 2C80-2CF3 # Coptic 2CF9-2CFF # Coptic and here is the result: % ./build/fc-validate/fc-validate -l cop /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansCoptic-Regular.ttf /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansCoptic-Regular.ttf:0 Satisfy the coverage for cop language % ./build/fc-validate/fc-validate -l cop /usr/share/fonts/liberation-sans-fonts/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf /usr/share/fonts/liberation-sans-fonts/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf:0 Missing 123 glyph(s) to satisfy the coverage for cop language Apparently Liberation doesn't have glyphs in disunification block supported since Unicode 4.1 like defined in the above orth at line number 2 and 3. Although it doesn't closely need to be the same, I don't know what is the minimal requirement to represent Coptic. If the unification code block is good enough, Liberation can satisfies Coptic coverage right. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201999864%23c11 -- _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
