DT> I think it was a bug in the Type 1 driver that was fixed in 2.1.0
DT> Could you tell me if it still persists ??
It's more reasonable, but still not quite consistent between Type 1
and TrueType. This may very well be the correct behaviour, though, as
the TrueType versions have much larger glyph coverage.
So that brings us back to my question: anybody have an idea about a
heuristic to provide a reasonable approximation of a font's average
width?
TrueType:
Times New Roman: 2.000 em
Arial: 2.000 em
Type 1:
Times New Roman PSMT: 1.000 em
Arial MT: 1.015 em
Juliusz
_______________________________________________
Fonts mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
