Around 12 o'clock on Oct 18, Jungshik Shin wrote: > Keith, we talked about this a month ago (Sep. 7th) on this very list > :-)
Sorry, I didn't look at the email address from your previous message. > One possible explanation is that Code2000 isn't marked as supporting 'ko' > in font-cache for some reason while Ngulim is. If your font specification includes language, this would cause Ngulim to be preferred over Code2000 if both are added to the pattern in the config file. If the application explicitly names 'Code2000' as a family name, then the language shouldn't matter. Code2000 isn't marked as supporting Korean as it is missing a large number of Han glyphs, totalling some 3136 characters from the KSC 5601-1992 encoding. Many Korean documents will not be completely covered by this font. It also isn't marked as supporting Japanese or any of the Chinese languages. Keith Packard XFree86 Core Team HP Cambridge Research Lab _______________________________________________ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
