Author: vhennebert
Date: Mon Oct 27 13:06:33 2008
New Revision: 708302

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=708302&view=rev
Log:
Fixed the 4 lines vs 5 lines example; incorrect indentation was making the 
calculation wrong

Modified:
    
xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_Interleaved_Page_Line_Breaking/prototype/doc/src/docbook/prototype.xml

Modified: 
xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_Interleaved_Page_Line_Breaking/prototype/doc/src/docbook/prototype.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_Interleaved_Page_Line_Breaking/prototype/doc/src/docbook/prototype.xml?rev=708302&r1=708301&r2=708302&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- 
xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_Interleaved_Page_Line_Breaking/prototype/doc/src/docbook/prototype.xml
 (original)
+++ 
xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_Interleaved_Page_Line_Breaking/prototype/doc/src/docbook/prototype.xml
 Mon Oct 27 13:06:33 2008
@@ -331,13 +331,13 @@
           the four-line versions are shorter this is possible to add the 
second space and one line 
           of the third paragraph on the page. Let’s see what are the 
resulting min-opt-max:</para>
         <literallayout class="monospaced">       5 lines:    4 lines:
-        5           4
-        1+1−1       1+1−1
-        5           4
-        1.5+0−1
-        1
-       ────────    ──────────
-Total:  11+1−1      11.5+1−2</literallayout>
+         5          4
+         1+1−1      1  +1−1
+         5          4
+                    1.5+0−1
+                    1
+       ────────   ──────────
+Total:  11+1−1     11.5+1−2</literallayout>
         <para>The two possibilities are overlapping, and would both fit in a 
page with a height of 
           12; how to order them? By the total optimum value? By the minimum 
value? This may be a 
           problem for the merging algorithm.</para>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to