Author: psancho
Date: Fri Feb 19 12:37:51 2010
New Revision: 911800
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=911800&view=rev
Log:
Fop WebSite: XSL-FO 1.0 references were still there; fixed now
Modified:
xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml
xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.95/upgrading.xml
xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/trunk/upgrading.xml
Modified:
xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml?rev=911800&r1=911799&r2=911800&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml
(original)
+++ xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml
Fri Feb 19 12:37:51 2010
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
<section id="important">
<title>Important!</title>
<p>
- If you're planning to upgrade to the latest FOP version there are a
few very important things
+ If you're planning to upgrade to the latest FOP version there are a
few very important things
to consider:
</p>
<ul>
@@ -63,21 +63,21 @@
</li>
<li>
<p>
- The new code is much more strict about the interpretation of the
XSL-FO 1.0 specification.
+ The new code is much more strict about the interpretation of the
XSL-FO 1.1 specification.
Things that worked fine in version 0.20.5 might start to produce
warnings or even errors
now. FOP 0.20.5 contains many bugs which have been corrected in
the new code.
</p>
<note label="An example">
While FOP 0.20.5 allowed you to have empty
<code>fo:table-cell</code> elements, the new code
will complain about that (unless <a
href="/0.94/running.html#fop-script">relaxed validation is enabled</a> via the
<code>-r</code> switch via the command line) because the specification
- demands at least one block-level element (<code>(%block;)+</code>,
see
- <a
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/slice6.html#fo_table-cell";>XSL-FO
1.0, 6.7.10</a>)
+ demands at least one block-level element (<code>(%block;)+</code>,
see
+ <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/#fo_table-cell";>XSL-FO 1.1,
6.7.10</a>)
inside an <code>fo:table-cell</code> element.
</note>
</li>
<li>
- Extensions and Renderers written for version 0.20.5 will not work
with the new code! The new FOP
- extension for <a
href="http://barcode4j.sourceforge.net";>Barcode4J</a> is available since
+ Extensions and Renderers written for version 0.20.5 will not work
with the new code! The new FOP
+ extension for <a
href="http://barcode4j.sourceforge.net";>Barcode4J</a> is available since
January 2007.
</li>
<li>
@@ -108,17 +108,17 @@
and <code>block-container</code> elements, for example.
</li>
<li>
- 0.20.5 is not XSL-FO compliant with respect to sizing images
(<code>external-graphic</code>)
+ 0.20.5 is not XSL-FO compliant with respect to sizing images
(<code>external-graphic</code>)
or <code>instream-foreign-object</code>
objects. If images or SVGs are sized differently in your outputs
with the new FOP version
check <a
href="http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37136";>Bug 37136</a>
- as it contains some hints on what to do. The file
+ as it contains some hints on what to do. The file
<a
href="http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/examples/fo/basic/images.fo?view=markup";>
<code>"examples/fo/basic/images.fo"</code></a> has
a number of good examples that show the new, more correct behaviour.
</li>
<li>
- The <code>fox:outline</code> extension is not implemented in this
version anymore.
+ The <code>fox:outline</code> extension is not implemented in this
version anymore.
It has been superseded by the new bookmark elements from XSL-FO 1.1.
</li>
<li>
Modified:
xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.95/upgrading.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.95/upgrading.xml?rev=911800&r1=911799&r2=911800&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.95/upgrading.xml
(original)
+++ xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.95/upgrading.xml
Fri Feb 19 12:37:51 2010
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
<section id="important">
<title>Important!</title>
<p>
- If you're planning to upgrade to the latest FOP version there are a
few very important things
+ If you're planning to upgrade to the latest FOP version there are a
few very important things
to consider:
</p>
<ul>
@@ -64,21 +64,21 @@
</li>
<li>
<p>
- The new code is much more strict about the interpretation of the
XSL-FO 1.0 specification.
+ The new code is much more strict about the interpretation of the
XSL-FO 1.1 specification.
Things that worked fine in version 0.20.5 might start to produce
warnings or even errors
now. FOP 0.20.5 contains many bugs which have been corrected in
the new code.
</p>
<note label="An example">
While FOP 0.20.5 allowed you to have empty
<code>fo:table-cell</code> elements, the new code
will complain about that (unless relaxed validation is enabled)
because the specification
- demands at least one block-level element (<code>(%block;)+</code>,
see
- <a
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/slice6.html#fo_table-cell";>XSL-FO
1.0, 6.7.10</a>)
+ demands at least one block-level element (<code>(%block;)+</code>,
see
+ <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/#fo_table-cell";>XSL-FO 1.1,
6.7.10</a>)
inside an <code>fo:table-cell</code> element.
</note>
</li>
<li>
- Extensions and Renderers written for version 0.20.5 will not work
with the new code! The new FOP
- extension for <a
href="http://barcode4j.sourceforge.net";>Barcode4J</a> is available since
+ Extensions and Renderers written for version 0.20.5 will not work
with the new code! The new FOP
+ extension for <a
href="http://barcode4j.sourceforge.net";>Barcode4J</a> is available since
January 2007.
</li>
<li>
@@ -106,17 +106,17 @@
and <code>block-container</code> elements, for example.
</li>
<li>
- 0.20.5 is not XSL-FO compliant with respect to sizing images
(<code>external-graphic</code>)
+ 0.20.5 is not XSL-FO compliant with respect to sizing images
(<code>external-graphic</code>)
or <code>instream-foreign-object</code>
objects. If images or SVGs are sized differently in your outputs
with the new FOP version
check <a
href="http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37136";>Bug 37136</a>
- as it contains some hints on what to do. The file
+ as it contains some hints on what to do. The file
<a
href="http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/examples/fo/basic/images.fo?view=markup";>
<code>"examples/fo/basic/images.fo"</code></a> has
a number of good examples that show the new, more correct behaviour.
</li>
<li>
- The <code>fox:outline</code> extension is not implemented in this
version anymore.
+ The <code>fox:outline</code> extension is not implemented in this
version anymore.
It has been superseded by the new bookmark elements from XSL-FO 1.1.
So please
update your stylesheets accordingly.
</li>
Modified:
xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/trunk/upgrading.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/trunk/upgrading.xml?rev=911800&r1=911799&r2=911800&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/trunk/upgrading.xml
(original)
+++ xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/trunk/upgrading.xml
Fri Feb 19 12:37:51 2010
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
<section id="important">
<title>Important!</title>
<p>
- If you're planning to upgrade to the latest FOP version there are a
few very important things
+ If you're planning to upgrade to the latest FOP version there are a
few very important things
to consider:
</p>
<ul>
@@ -64,21 +64,21 @@
</li>
<li>
<p>
- The new code is much more strict about the interpretation of the
XSL-FO 1.0 specification.
+ The new code is much more strict about the interpretation of the
XSL-FO 1.1 specification.
Things that worked fine in version 0.20.5 might start to produce
warnings or even errors
now. FOP 0.20.5 contains many bugs which have been corrected in
the new code.
</p>
<note label="An example">
While FOP 0.20.5 allowed you to have empty
<code>fo:table-cell</code> elements, the new code
will complain about that (unless relaxed validation is enabled)
because the specification
- demands at least one block-level element (<code>(%block;)+</code>,
see
- <a
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/slice6.html#fo_table-cell";>XSL-FO
1.0, 6.7.10</a>)
+ demands at least one block-level element (<code>(%block;)+</code>,
see
+ <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/#fo_table-cell";>XSL-FO 1.1,
6.7.10</a>)
inside an <code>fo:table-cell</code> element.
</note>
</li>
<li>
- Extensions and Renderers written for version 0.20.5 will not work
with the new code! The new FOP
- extension for <a
href="http://barcode4j.sourceforge.net";>Barcode4J</a> is available since
+ Extensions and Renderers written for version 0.20.5 will not work
with the new code! The new FOP
+ extension for <a
href="http://barcode4j.sourceforge.net";>Barcode4J</a> is available since
January 2007.
</li>
<li>
@@ -109,17 +109,17 @@
and <code>block-container</code> elements, for example.
</li>
<li>
- 0.20.5 is not XSL-FO compliant with respect to sizing images
(<code>external-graphic</code>)
+ 0.20.5 is not XSL-FO compliant with respect to sizing images
(<code>external-graphic</code>)
or <code>instream-foreign-object</code>
objects. If images or SVGs are sized differently in your outputs
with the new FOP version
check <a
href="http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37136";>Bug 37136</a>
- as it contains some hints on what to do. The file
+ as it contains some hints on what to do. The file
<a
href="http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/examples/fo/basic/images.fo?view=markup";>
<code>"examples/fo/basic/images.fo"</code></a> has
a number of good examples that show the new, more correct behaviour.
</li>
<li>
- The <code>fox:outline</code> extension is not implemented in this
version anymore.
+ The <code>fox:outline</code> extension is not implemented in this
version anymore.
It has been superseded by the new bookmark elements from XSL-FO 1.1.
</li>
</ul>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
