DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40271>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40271 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-17 18:19 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I did wonder whether this should be viewed on a per-page basis...? I mean: say you have a table with > five cells per row (100+ rows), except for the last row which has six. > Do we layout the whole table as if there were six columns, or only the last > page? Look at it this way: You'd expect an fo:block to occupy the whole width on both pages if that block is broken between two pages and the first is a landscape page and the second is a portrait page. Now transfer this to fo:table where you might specify columns entirely using proportional-column-width() (or even using auto-table layout). Especially when specifying the table width using width="100%" you define that the area generated by the FO occupies 100% of the width of the containing area. So, especially in the light of the upcoming changes for "changing available IPD", there's a possibility that you'll have to recalculate the column setup for every page. Not that the table layout can already deal with this situation, but it will have to at some point. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
