https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51843
--- Comment #35 from Jacky <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #34) > (In reply to comment #33) > Hi All, > > I encountered the same issue on my > applications using fop 1.0. > Glad to see the issue is going to be fixed in > the coming version. > May I know if this bug will be fixed in version 1.1 > only or it will be > patched in version 1.0, too? No, this is NOT going to > be fixed in the upcoming version. I have made NO statements about when this > will be addressed in FOP. In particular, it will NOT be patched in 1.0 and > will NOT be addressed in 1.1. This is a POSSIBLE 1.2 (or later) fix. (In reply to comment #34) > (In reply to comment #33) > Hi All, > > I encountered the same issue on my > applications using fop 1.0. > Glad to see the issue is going to be fixed in > the coming version. > May I know if this bug will be fixed in version 1.1 > only or it will be > patched in version 1.0, too? No, this is NOT going to > be fixed in the upcoming version. I have made NO statements about when this > will be addressed in FOP. In particular, it will NOT be patched in 1.0 and > will NOT be addressed in 1.1. This is a POSSIBLE 1.2 (or later) fix. Hi Adams, Nice to see you'd considered this thread. As I knew, even mainframe has similiar issues in using supporting surrogate pairs. Is that any workaround if stick to latest FOP version, or any news on tenative rollout of v1.2? Jacky -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
