in that case, +1 from me On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Luis Bernardo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Includes layout tests. > > > On 11/25/14, 5:14 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: > > What are your plans for testing? I haven't looked, but does your branch > include new unit tests for this feature? > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Luis Bernardo <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> I would like to merge the branch branches/Temp_BasicSideFloats to trunk. >> The branch has a implementation of side floats that uses the same approach >> used when handling change in IPD across pages. >> >> These are the known limitations: >> -- the "clear" fo:float attribute is ignored; only the float attribute >> (left or right) is used >> -- overlapping of floats in the Y is not handled (even in the case >> there would not be overlap in the X direction) >> -- floats that extend beyond the body region are not properly handled >> and will overflow past the edge of the region >> -- if a float extends to bottom of the body region and there are >> footnotes in the page the float may overlap with the footnote region >> -- floats next to a table are not supported unless the start and end of >> the table happens in between the start and end of the float >> >> Examples can be found in the thread with subject "RFC: basic side >> floats" in this mailing list. >> >> To follow due process and since this will be a new major feature I am >> launching a vote. >> >> Please vote or report a bug before the end of Monday UTC, December 1st. >> >> > >
