I don't see any reason why it wouldn't work.
Are the files (eg. XHTML-DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent) available relative to where
fop is being run or relative to the document (depends on how it is being
run)?

I hope you have declared the namespace for fo (unlike in the sample).

Can you turn on debugging (-d on the command line) and see what the full
error message is?

On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 00:44:32 Matthew L. Avizinis wrote:
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
> <!DOCTYPE section [
> <!ENTITY % XHTML-lat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1//EN//XML"
>          "XHTML-DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">
>   %XHTML-lat1;
> <!ENTITY % XHTML-special PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Special//EN//XML"
>          "XHTML-DTD/xhtml-special.ent">
>  %XHTML-special;
> <!ENTITY % XHTML-symbol PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Symbols//EN//XML"
>          "XHTML-DTD/xhtml-symbol.ent">
>  %XHTML-symbol;
> ]>
> <root>
> ...
> </root>
> 
> Is fop 0.20.2 or 0.20.1 supposed to fail when the above DOCTYPE is
> included
> in an xml file?  That is, are DOCTYPES allowed in xml files processed
> with
> fop?  It works without it and generates "[ERROR] R" when it's included.
> Xerces and Xalan don't seem to have any problems with it, so I'm
> expecting
> it to be fop.
> thanks,
> 
>    Matthew L. Avizinis <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Gleim Publications, Inc.
>    4201 NW 95th Blvd.
>  Gainesville, FL 32606
> (352)-375-0772 ext. 101
>       www.gleim.com <http://www.gleim.com>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to