I don't see any reason why it wouldn't work. Are the files (eg. XHTML-DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent) available relative to where fop is being run or relative to the document (depends on how it is being run)?
I hope you have declared the namespace for fo (unlike in the sample). Can you turn on debugging (-d on the command line) and see what the full error message is? On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 00:44:32 Matthew L. Avizinis wrote: > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?> > <!DOCTYPE section [ > <!ENTITY % XHTML-lat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1//EN//XML" > "XHTML-DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent"> > %XHTML-lat1; > <!ENTITY % XHTML-special PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Special//EN//XML" > "XHTML-DTD/xhtml-special.ent"> > %XHTML-special; > <!ENTITY % XHTML-symbol PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Symbols//EN//XML" > "XHTML-DTD/xhtml-symbol.ent"> > %XHTML-symbol; > ]> > <root> > ... > </root> > > Is fop 0.20.2 or 0.20.1 supposed to fail when the above DOCTYPE is > included > in an xml file? That is, are DOCTYPES allowed in xml files processed > with > fop? It works without it and generates "[ERROR] R" when it's included. > Xerces and Xalan don't seem to have any problems with it, so I'm > expecting > it to be fop. > thanks, > > Matthew L. Avizinis <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Gleim Publications, Inc. > 4201 NW 95th Blvd. > Gainesville, FL 32606 > (352)-375-0772 ext. 101 > www.gleim.com <http://www.gleim.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
