J.Pietschmann wrote:

> - If the FO objects are primarily data holders, why
>   have them at all, instead of using a standard DOM?
I believe standard DOM implementations are obviously too synchronized to 
provide thread-safe access, while fo tree is built sequentially and is 
read-only after its building is done, so we have more possibilities to 
optimize it.

-- 
Oleg Tkachenko
Multiconn International, Israel


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to