J.Pietschmann wrote: > - If the FO objects are primarily data holders, why > have them at all, instead of using a standard DOM? I believe standard DOM implementations are obviously too synchronized to provide thread-safe access, while fo tree is built sequentially and is read-only after its building is done, so we have more possibilities to optimize it.
-- Oleg Tkachenko Multiconn International, Israel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]