> Marcin Zawadzki wrote:
> > If somebody is working on property "page-break-inside" ?
> No. Its way down the priority list because its basically redundant.
> The only sensoble setting is page-break-inside="avoid", which is the
> same as keep-together="always", simply replace it. Keep in mind
> that keep-together only workss on table rows, so you might want
> to use the old blind table trick.
> J.Pietschmann

Maybe I something dont understand.
I have folowing problem with table rows:

How to force table rows to be on one page only.
When row is to big to fit on actual page it should be moved to next page. I
try keeps nad breaks, but it seens to work in diffrent matter.

Marcin Zawadzki

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to