On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 00:56, Oleg Tkachenko wrote: > Hello! > > Just curious, why AreaTreeModel is defined as static inner class of > AreaTree class? It doesn't look like real inner class as it's abstract > and has 3 implementations. Are there any objections against moving it out?
Mainly it is there because that is where it was put first. The initial idea was that the model would be internal to the AreaTree and not really need to be known outside. The development has shown that the case is different and there will be external implementations, such as caching, which could be created in other places. So it would probably be better moved out, so go ahead. The implementations should also be moved out. By the way, I have checked that the area tree, renderer and pdf lib are not holding onto any memory apart from current working objects (when caching), such as a page and current pdf stream. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
