DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16257>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16257

Problems with adding true type fonts to FOP

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-01-21 10:51 -------
Bug fixed for Meta Normal. Can't tell for the Batang Font what's wrong there 
without seeing it. Do you get an error message when generating XML font metrics?

If you're lucky, the bugfix will be in the 0.20.5 release. If not, you'll have 
to download FOP from CVS.
See: http://xml.apache.org/fop/download.html

For interested devs: The MetaNormal font had zero values for ascender and 
descender in the hhea table. If provided a fallback to the sTypoAscender and 
sTypoDescender (found in the OS/2 table).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to