Well, it looks like Batik 1.5 label in CVS was set on 2003.07.11 so if the
Batik JAR in FOP 1.0 is the latest build from 2003.10.11 then we are already
using something newer than Batik 1.5.

I don't know if it would be appropriate but it would be nice to have a
corresponding label in Batik CVS for JARs checked in to FOP.  This way we would
know what source code it corresponds to.  The way it is now I don't know how to
find the source code for Batik JAR in FOP.  Is it is from 2003.07.11 in the
morning, or evening, or...

I see a new label in Batik CVS as "batik-1_5_1rc2".  I might try to pull that
code and see if it works with FOP 1.0.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 11:13 AM
> Subject: Re: PDFTranscoder & Batik library in FOP 1.0
> Current batik.jar is from Oct 11 2003 and is a snapshot from 
> CVS if I read the commit message right.
> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-fop/lib/batik.jar
> Whether it works with Batik 1.5 I can't tell. But I hope so. 
> If not, that API should finally get nailed down.
> On 28.12.2003 19:11:21 Petar wrote:
> > Looking through the old posts I noticed that it seems that 
> there is a 
> > special version of Batik library being checked in with FOP. 
>  Is there 
> > any way to find out what version of Batik source code does 
> this Batik 
> > JAR in FOP 1.0 correspond to?  Is this just a snapshot of Batik at 
> > some point (1.5 for example) or does it contain special FOP-related 
> > changes?  Will PDFTranscoder work with Batik 1.5?
> > 
> > I am trying to track down some behaviors and I need to take 
> a look at 
> > corresponding Batik source code.
> Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to