DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124 New line breaking algorithm ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-19 19:30 ------- Luca, This is a good piece of work again. Nevertheless, I did succeed in breaking the code. See the following test fo files. Nested inline and other LMs: The output contains errors, see the comments in the text. The errors occur when hyphenation is set to true. Justification: This is a test fo you submitted earlier. According to the text in the file the second block should be hyphenated; it is not. Should it still be hyphenated, or can this not be enforced with the Knuth algorithm and text-align="start"? No breakpoints: An exception is thrown, at LineLayoutManager.getNextBreakPoss(LineLayoutManager.java:495). It occurs because breakpoints has size 0; the third call to findBreakingPoints also returned 0. This should not be possible; the algorithm should always return a breakpoint. A few small remarks: Can you move the following log messages to trace log level: [DEBUG] AbstractLayoutManager - - Word to hyphenate: We In TextLM, returning null for a forced LF is not an idea that I like, because it overloads the null return value. Cannot you return an special Knuth element for LF? Alternatively, you could return null and process the paragraph. The second paragraph would then be produced and processed later. InlineStackingLM.getNextKnuthElements: 'if (lc.startsNewArea())' no longer used? Regards, Simon
