Finn Bock wrote:

> I've been playing around with the knuth line breaking code and made a
> slight refactoring of it. [...]
> These improvements could also be applied to the existing code, so I
> think the more interesting point is the quality of the refactoring
> job.

I think this is a very good patch, and it could be applied as it is now:
my last changes introduced a first fit algorithm used if the Knuth's one
failed, but your re-starting strategy seems much better.


Reply via email to