Sorry. Still learning. Thanks for paying attention. Fixed. On 06.01.2005 13:33:08 Finn Bock wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Log: > > convertValueForProperty didn't have the right signature and > > therefore didn't override the superclass implementation. > > That was sloppy of me. Thanks for finding and fixing it. > > > + ListProperty listProperty = (ListProperty)property; > > That is a no-no. Properties should not be casted but only be coerced > using the getXXX methods. > > And the getList() method is already defined on Property so no cast is > needed. > > Using casts will prevent us from adding property proxies, which i > suspect will be needed.