Sorry. Still learning. Thanks for paying attention. Fixed.

On 06.01.2005 13:33:08 Finn Bock wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> >   Log:
> >   convertValueForProperty didn't have the right signature and
> >   therefore didn't override the superclass implementation.
> 
> That was sloppy of me. Thanks for finding and fixing it.
> 
> >   +        ListProperty listProperty = (ListProperty)property;
> 
> That is a no-no. Properties should not be casted but only be coerced 
> using the getXXX methods.
> 
> And the getList() method is already defined on Property so no cast is 
> needed.
> 
> Using casts will prevent us from adding property proxies, which i 
> suspect will be needed.



Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to