I don't think this is needed (unless I'm missing your reasoning here.)
The validation in the FO Tree would raise errors otherwise, at least one
page-sequence being required by the fo:root FO. The validation scheme
was designed so you don't need subsequent safety checks further downstream.
Glen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
jeremias 2005/01/19 13:45:07
Modified: src/java/org/apache/fop/render/xml XMLRenderer.java
Log:
Safety check
Revision Changes Path
1.38 +3 -1 xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/render/xml/XMLRenderer.java
Index: XMLRenderer.java
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/render/xml/XMLRenderer.java,v
retrieving revision 1.37
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -r1.37 -r1.38
--- XMLRenderer.java 18 Jan 2005 08:55:58 -0000 1.37
+++ XMLRenderer.java 19 Jan 2005 21:45:07 -0000 1.38
@@ -313,7 +313,9 @@
* @see org.apache.fop.render.Renderer#stopRenderer()
*/
public void stopRenderer() throws IOException {
- endElement("pageSequence");
+ if (startedSequence) {
+ endElement("pageSequence");
+ }
endElement("areaTree");
try {
handler.endDocument();
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
