I'm +1 on that. It's something I remember mentioning myself. I heard
people say that this is best pratice not to have build.sh/bat.

On 26.02.2005 14:14:21 Glen Mazza wrote:
> Team,
> 
> Build.bat and build.sh just call "ant" internally
> today (and tell them to get Ant if it is not available
> on their machine)--I would like to move these
> instructions for how to download & activate Ant to our
> README file instead, and remove these two files.  (The
> check for JAVA_HOME is already done by Ant, so nothing
> lost there.)  Are we at the stage yet that we can rely
> on just a build.xml?
> 
> With this change, instead of calling "build" to start
> a build, the user will just type "ant" instead.  (The
> README file will tell them this.)  I suspect we'll get
> a few more emails on the ML from people who don't read
> the README file, but learning a little about Ant--if
> only the fact that they need to type "ant"--is
> probably a Good Thing for them anyway.
> 
> Thanks,
> Glen



Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to