I'm +1 on that. It's something I remember mentioning myself. I heard people say that this is best pratice not to have build.sh/bat.
On 26.02.2005 14:14:21 Glen Mazza wrote: > Team, > > Build.bat and build.sh just call "ant" internally > today (and tell them to get Ant if it is not available > on their machine)--I would like to move these > instructions for how to download & activate Ant to our > README file instead, and remove these two files. (The > check for JAVA_HOME is already done by Ant, so nothing > lost there.) Are we at the stage yet that we can rely > on just a build.xml? > > With this change, instead of calling "build" to start > a build, the user will just type "ant" instead. (The > README file will tell them this.) I suspect we'll get > a few more emails on the ML from people who don't read > the README file, but learning a little about Ant--if > only the fact that they need to type "ant"--is > probably a Good Thing for them anyway. > > Thanks, > Glen Jeremias Maerki
