Glen, > BTW, have the licensing headaches been taken of?
If you mean the ones about Sun's codec [1], then yes, since my code only relies on Batik. But I'm not sure that I understand the whole thing about licences... Could you check it? Thanks. > Did Oleg update the license headers for TIFF, etc? AFAIK No, but I thought my mail would motivate him to do so ;) It's on the TODO list of the wiki page FopAndJava2D. What I could reuse from Oleg's TIFFRenderer is an inner class (TIFFRenderer$LazyPageImagesIterator). It also speeded up my work (understand how codec work). > I'm happy to to hear of the > Java2DRenderer/AWTRenderer split, but if there are any > license issues in the other parts of the code, we > should not be applying those portions. You are right. I don't expect this patch to be applied anyway, it's just my work in progress. What I need is a tap on the shoulder to tell me that I'm heading in the right directions :) By the time my code will be ready, we shall/must have the legal issues solved. Regards, Renaud [1] http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgId=2113510
