--- "Andreas L. Delmelle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry to be such a nitpick, but the 1.0 Rec. states > literally: > > "An fo:marker is only permitted as the descendant of > an fo:flow." > and > "An fo:retrieve-marker is only permitted as the > descendant of an > fo:static-content." >
Thanks for the correction--I had checked just the content model of fo:flow, which indicated fo:retrieve-marker would be allowed. It would be nice if those two statements above were duplicated in the parent's CM descriptions--that's where people normally go to see which child FO's are allowed/disallowed. Perhaps I'll make a request to the xsl editors ML sometime. Glen
