> I don't intend to. It would send the wrong signal. I've > already renamed > the API to avoid "FOP" in the name, so I don't scare potential > commercial implementors away. It's probably going to end up > on java.net. > But it's Apache v2 licensed, just like FOP. The intention is > to have as > many implementations as possible to make it easier to switch between > different XSL-FO implementations without modifying too much > in Java code.
ok I see, sounds interessting, I'll *observer* that stuff, but currently I need something different ;) > > do you know more details regarding the implementation of > this feature? > > Depends on what you want to know. I can surely give pointers > to someone > who would like to try implementing it. But I haven't invested too much > thought into how this would be done. Ah, I thought there is still something regarding table-layout="auto" inside of CVS. -Matthias > > Thanks for your informations, > > Matthias > > > > > be me since > > > I'm into strict XSL-FO business document where this was never > > > an issue, > > > yet. > > > > > > I hope the above helps. > > > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > > > > > > > > Jeremias Maerki > >