> I don't intend to. It would send the wrong signal. I've 
> already renamed
> the API to avoid "FOP" in the name, so I don't scare potential
> commercial implementors away. It's probably going to end up 
> on java.net.
> But it's Apache v2 licensed, just like FOP. The intention is 
> to have as
> many implementations as possible to make it easier to switch between
> different XSL-FO implementations without modifying too much 
> in Java code.


ok I see, sounds interessting, I'll *observer* that stuff, but currently 
I need something different ;)

> > do you know more details regarding the implementation of 
> this feature?
> 
> Depends on what you want to know. I can surely give pointers 
> to someone
> who would like to try implementing it. But I haven't invested too much
> thought into how this would be done.


Ah, I thought there is still something regarding table-layout="auto" inside of 
CVS.

-Matthias

> > Thanks for your informations,
> > Matthias
> > 
> > > be me since
> > > I'm into strict XSL-FO business document where this was never 
> > > an issue,
> > > yet.
> > > 
> > > I hope the above helps.
> > > 
> > > Jeremias Maerki
> > > 
> > > 
> 
> 
> 
> Jeremias Maerki
> 
> 

Reply via email to