Ah, ok. Thank you. Will shut up then. These checks would only have eaten performance.
On 24.06.2005 17:44:28 Glen Mazza wrote: > The recommendation allows any property to be on any FO (First sentence > of section 5 of 1.1[1], but also somewhere in 1.0), regardless of its > utility. So we don't need to mention this as a warning. > > We *might* want to do this in a few areas though where newbies might > make very common mistakes (and be upset that FOP isn't working they way > they think it should be as a result), however. > > Glen > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl11/#refinement > > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > >While creating the check for the span attributes a few minutes ago, I > >wondered if we shouldn't actually warn about explicit non-inherited > >properties on FO they don't apply to. We currently don't do that AFAICS. > >Am I right that this is a task that we shouldn't forget? > > > >Jeremias Maerki > > > > > > > > Jeremias Maerki
